“Theory, Literature, and Hoax” (from The NYT)

Posted: May 7, 2010 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

A friend of mine posted this link today, and the article’s just too good not to repost and pass around to as many folk as possible.  I’m enthralled with Rebecca Goldstein’s prose…and am more than a little sympathetic to her underlying point, and verbal jabs (as anyone who knows me can attest).  Truth to tell, I’ve become reconciled to some uses and manifestations of theory of late, though I’ve been drawn more to anthropological than literary theory.  The more one consults the original documents, however, or so I’ve found, the less one is concerned with theory.  Theory comes afterward, and is a very a posteriori proposition.  Of that much I am convinced.  BUT, don’t listen to me, read this delightful article for yourself…In style, reminds me of some of  jocular ramblings of my brother’s literary alter-ego…

  1. Mikhail Bakhtin: Notes on “Epic and Novel” (Part 3)*…

    Bakhtin explains his main project, articulating a viable theory of the novel, as follows: I will attempt below to approach the novel precisely as a genre-in-the-making, one in the vanguard of all modern literary development. I am not constructing here …

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s