Posts Tagged ‘digital humanities’

I was asked yesterday how I would evaluate students’ digital projects, and today I just came from #AHA2015 #s195, where a lot of the discussion centered on the challenges of having your work evaluated for promotion.

Regarding the question of evaluating student work: I was quite prepared to be asked that, but probably didn’t answer it as fluently as I might have because to my mind this question, which everyone asks, gets it backwards. Essentially, I regard the appearance of a digital project in a similar fashion to the cover and contents of a book: it might look interesting and well done, but I can’t tell from a quick glance whether it is logically and analytically rigorous. I need to dive in, look at the structure, understand the argument, examine where the choices were made, and assess how it has been received at large.  In other words, I’m more concerned with logic and argumentation than with the way in which a particular work is packaged or presented. Perhaps it’s due to my training in debate, and then going on to medieval studies, but I want to see how you’re reasoning and arguing. In the Middle Ages, the “humanities” as such didn’t exist; history and literature weren’t courses, and the social sciences hadn’t been invented. Instead, you learned the mechanics, process, and metaphysics of reasoning, which you then applied to politics, history, theology, philosophy, etc. At the same time, foregrounding argument and debate is also a touch democratic, since audience always matters. You stand or fall by your ability to convince, and anything that promotes democratic habits of mind is a plus, in my opinion.

So, asking how I would evaluate a digital project versus a typed paper, while a necessary question given the (improving) reception of DH in academia, just doesn’t make sense in my way of approaching the problem. The biggest challenge, to my mind, isn’t whether I have a grasp of genre, it’s awakening my students’ minds to the excitement and challenge of reasoning from concept to data and back to concept. Another way of putting it is that my criteria for a successful project do not derive from the discipline of the project itself. Mills Kelly just said more-or-less, in essence, the same thing in #s195, which suggests to me that I’m on the right track. It’s not about content and discipline, per se, it’s about showing me (and even better, your wider audience) how you’re using your intellect. It might be a semi-“medieval” approach, but that’s my two cents, for what it’s worth.

If you live in the New York City area this January, and are an historian, you’re in luck: the AHA is in our back yard this time around. Of course, we’ve also been thrown a curve ball in that New Year’s Day is a Thursday, so the conference goes all the way through Monday (ick…).  Now, from a medievalist’s perspective the AHA tends to be pretty grim. There are very, very few premodern sessions, and the ones that do exist aren’t always in one’s area of interest. That being said, here are the sessions that caught my eye in the program, complete with hyperlink to more detailed information. Maybe I’ll see you at some of them!

Friday, January 2

AHA Session 2  Teaching and Learning the Great War in the Digital Age

Time and Place: 1:00 PM-3:00 PM, Beekman Parlor (New York Hilton, Second Floor)

Society of Civil War Historians 2 Contested Loyalty: Debates over Patriotism in the Civil War North

Time and Place: 3:30 PM-5:30 PM, Conference Room J (Sheraton New York, Lower Level)

AHA Session 42 Digital Tools: From the Archive to Publication

Time and Place: 3:30 PM-5:30 PM, Beekman Parlor (New York Hilton, Second Floor)

Co-sponsored by MapStory Reception for History Bloggers and Twitterstorians

Time and Place: 5:30 PM-6:30 PM, Central Park East (Sheraton New York, Second Floor)


Saturday, January 3

AHA Session 75 Imperial Policing and the Networks of Empire

Time and Place:8:30 AM-10:00 AM, Conference Room D (Sheraton New York, Lower Level)


A short post about change and random news…

Change is always in the air. Or so they say.  Even, though my students seem skeptical, on the western front in World War I. It’s such an odd war. In almost every respect the defining conflict of the modern and post modern age, it has suffered from a good deal of neglect. Perhaps because it is regarded as the quintessence of a useless war. Ultimately, it spawned more problems than it solved, and it didn’t even solve those very well.  It fed problems it was in capable of solving. And while I’ve become reconciled to Strachan’s claim that it was a war “about big ideas,” I still cannot shake the doom and gloom of Owen’s and Sassoon’s poetry. It was a war blundered into by societies with plenty of big ideas but with those ideas in bloody,  fatal competition. Societies that had no clear aim or purpose or method in mind for their war, just a sense that military action would solve a couple apparent threats.  Which it did, I suppose.  Hmmm…I think I just described most wars over most eras. Deep.

Anyway, all this is to say, change happens. For the blog, I’ve made some small ones, to include a revised CV section, and the return of the Flickr album.  I’ll be putting more pictures up there in the coming weeks. In terms of news coverage, I also linked my Twitter and WordPress feeds, so pay attention to the Twitter bar in the right column. Retweeting individual interesting websites, databases, and news items is a lot more practical than blogging them–for instance, I would never have stumbled upon Medieval Illuminators without Twitter.  For extended discussions and essays, blogging still has a considerable edge; look this week for an essay post on the Late Roman Army, and in the following three-four weeks a couple posts on the Humanities and the Digital Humanities. Or at least my take on them.

On a digital topic, change affects even digital art and archives.  And speaking of digital archives, the following link is a wonderful image resource for your class slides and presentations:

To dip into contemporary affairs for a bit: here’s a short column from Tenured Radical on the Lance Armstrong on Oprah show.  Sometimes the blog’s columns make me shake my head more than nod it, but this column is quite good. Right on the money. Because Dr. Potter is right, it’s all about the money.

On a cheerier note, inauguration, anyone? NPR has been keeping up a string of interesting posts about Presidential Inaugurations past and present. The food disaster that was Lincoln’s second inaugural ball, in 1865.  An Inauguration Trivia Quiz, yipee. And so on. Good luck in your second term, Mr. President.